U.S. prepping for 'tank-on-tank' war?

In the light of the following facts: Obama orchestrated the over throw of Mubarak in Egypt and installed a Muslim Brotherhood run military  government, he orchestrated the over throw of Gadaffi in Libya and installed a government that immediately legalized the Muslim Brotherhood and he is in middle of orchestrating the over throw of Bashar Assad in Syria in order to install a Muslim Brotherhood government, which in preparation for he is presently negotiating with Iraq to keep US soldiers there for an additional two years and NATO is training for in Turkey, it stands to reason that the tank on tank training in the article below might be aimed at a war with Syria that could include Russia, which has not made any open threats but is presently arming and training Syria to defend their country against these anti-Semitic left liberals. Syria is sandwiched between Turkey and Iraq and if Iran becomes involved it would become their eastern front while Afghanistan would become Iran's eastern front and the Taliban and Pakistan would become a different eastern front for  American troops in Afghanistan than it already is. The Wahabi Muslim Caucasus would make it more difficult for Russia to enter the war zone through the Caucasus, however they could go around them either by entering Turkey across the Black Sea or through Iran via the Caspian Sea. Any attack on Syria would certainly open the door for stepped up attacks against American troops in Afghanistan by the Taliban that could include Pakistanis armed by China. The left liberals, in the USA, in Europe and their Muslim Brotherhood cohorts are openly psychotic enough about their anti-Christian/Semitism that they are capable of acting this careless in order to over throw Assad and install their favorite and adopted Muslim Brotherhood terrorist organization that they are presently using in their own evil agenda in Europe and the USA.  

U.S. prepping for 'tank-on-tank' war?

Source reports top echelon 'expecting something conventional, and big'

Publishing Date: 03.10.11 11:46

By F. Michael Maloof

Breaking development 

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Army is about to undertake a doctrinal change wherein its training for soldiers will shift from counter-insurgency, or COIN, to more conventional tactics over the next five years – even though the Department of Defense itself projects that the nation will be fighting counter-insurgency for many years to come, a DoD source told G2Bulletin. "They're dressing it up as 'troops have entirely forgotten how to fight a conventional force-on-force (tank-on-tank) fight,' and we need to get back into doing that," the source quoted army commanders as saying. "Commanders would rather kill something than build something," he added, "but they will never say that outright." The source said that the statement that there's been no force-on-force training for the past 12 years has been "disingenuous" when training has continued as before but with the added COIN element included. Counter-insurgency does not just involve "building something" and training soldiers to be more involved in building relationships with the local population where U.S. troops are engaged but also how to "fight a guerrilla like a guerrilla," other sources said. The DoD source said that the U.S. experience in undertaking counter-insurgency activities may have fallen short of more successful efforts by other countries, such as the French. He pointed out that COIN was "loosely based" on the French experience in Algeria from 1957 to 1959 and "we only sort of imitated the ideas without ever actually going to the lengths the French went to." He pointed out that the French had aggressive interrogation and good intelligence. He said they could occupy towns, stop reprisal assassinations and could control borders. :"We did none of these things in IZ or AFG (Iraq or Afghanistan)," he said. "It's like command said 'this is a good idea, let's just do it [halfway].'" The DoD source didn't rule out the prospect that the decision to de-emphasize counter-insurgency training may be related to the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of the year and from Afghanistan by 2014. "Going to a primarily conventional posture is totally counter-intuitive," the DoD source said, "unless it's based on the (Obama) administration getting us entirely out of the two theaters regardless of conditions on the ground, ASAP, or possibly we're anticipating something else." He indicated that the "something else" may also be due to "expecting something conventional, and big, coming down the pipe relatively soon." Asked what that could be, the DOD source indicated that it would involve Israel "and whoever mixes it up with them (the Israelis)."