Palah Biswas On Unique Identity No1.mpg

Unique Identity No2

Please send the LINK to your Addresslist and send me every update, event, development,documents and FEEDBACK . just mail to palashbiswaskl@gmail.com

Website templates

Zia clarifies his timing of declaration of independence

what mujib said

Jyothi Basu Is Dead

Unflinching Left firm on nuke deal

Jyoti Basu's Address on the Lok Sabha Elections 2009

Basu expresses shock over poll debacle

Jyoti Basu: The Pragmatist

Dr.BR Ambedkar

Memories of Another day

Memories of Another day
While my Parents Pulin Babu and basanti Devi were living

"The Day India Burned"--A Documentary On Partition Part-1/9

Partition

Partition of India - refugees displaced by the partition

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Fwd: [Right to Education] DCPCR is the not only one to raise objections to...



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Priya Singh <notification+kr4marbae4mn@facebookmail.com>
Date: Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 3:32 PM
Subject: [Right to Education] DCPCR is the not only one to raise objections to...
To: Palash Biswas <palashbiswaskl@gmail.com>


DCPCR is the not only one to raise objections to the latest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : "Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of law it has been issued." http://www.facebook.com/l/3220f4oFynDmFAa_JiaELOdTXRg;timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms#ixzz18SL0g3s0
Priya Singh 3:32pm Dec 18
DCPCR is the not only one to raise objections to the latest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : "Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of law it has been issued."
http://www.facebook.com/l/3220f4oFynDmFAa_JiaELOdTXRg;timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms#ixzz18SL0g3s0
New norms violate RTE, says panel - The Times of India
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009.

View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.



--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment